I read a blog post that made my blood boil, and I wanted to do the following:
1. link to it
2. summarize the points that I believe are wrong (it's about self publishing and the guy sounds like he wrote it about the state of self publishing in the 1800s)
3. rebut it.
The blog post clearly state, however, that you can't reuse any portion of it without the idiot's express permission.
I was thinking that the "fair use" doctrine would allow me to do what I'm planning. What say you?