Read Reviews on Amazon

Results 1 to 6 of 6

Extended spoken recount versus expositional flash back

This is a discussion on "Extended spoken recount versus expositional flash back" in the Writing Questions forum.

  1. #1
    Senior Member The Din's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    163
    Reputation
    75

    Extended spoken recount versus expositional flash back

    I have my hero arriving in town shortly after an ambush where his damsel is kidnapped. (I know it reeks of cliche, but there's more to it than that.) The story of the ambush is a bit of a doozy (1000+ words), though pivotal to the story. At the moment I have an eyewitness explaining the event through dialogue, pages of the stuff. Just wondering if coming across such a dialogue heavy few pages would sour the reader, especially being mostly one sided.

    I have experimented with using exposition instead, ie:
    The fellow set down his tankard. 'I can see you won't let me drink my beer in peace until you hear the sordid tale, so sit back, shut up, and lend me your ear.' Words began to spill from the man's lips. They painted pictures of pain and betrayal, pictures that burned like acid and dragged him kicking and screaming into the harrowing scene...

    The damsel and her protector rode into town, unaware of the soldiers lying in wait... blah blah blah.


    It works to do it that way, but it feels like cheating and lacks the personality of the speaker who can otherwise impose his views on the event, ie:
    'The disfigured wench and her greybearded lover rode into town, as sorry a pair as I've seen this side of a graveyard fence. If only they'd known then what awaited them...'

    Anyway, just wondering if I can get away with such a big chunk of dialogue, and if so, how would I punctuate dialogue within dialogue, ie:
    'The man dragged on the reins when he saw the soldier. "Get out of here girl, I'll keep them busy." (' or no as its technically the end of paragraph?)
    (' or no as there is already "?) "Not without you!"

    Thanks in advance.

  2. #2
    Senior Member sashamerideth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    756
    Reputation
    126
    If I were going to be hunting down someone that had kidnapped my lover, I wouldn't be sitting around while some windbag told me a long tale. I would be riding out with a fresh horse, and dragging the windbag with me so he can tell me the important stuff as I track down the people that now need their insides to be on their outside.

    If you want to do a lot of exposition then I would go the flashback route, or else break up the monologue with questions, actions, and other things to grab interest.
    Come visit my blog, and see what I've been up to.

  3. #3
    Senior Member The Din's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    163
    Reputation
    75
    Quote Originally Posted by sashamerideth View Post
    If I were going to be hunting down someone that had kidnapped my lover, I wouldn't be sitting around while some windbag told me a long tale. I would be riding out with a fresh horse, and dragging the windbag with me so he can tell me the important stuff as I track down the people that now need their insides to be on their outside.

    If you want to do a lot of exposition then I would go the flashback route, or else break up the monologue with questions, actions, and other things to grab interest.
    Let's just say its not not so easy as that (injured, can't ride, villains are too far gone to catch up and too many to overpower anyway, damsel is not his lover). Thus the hero has to plan his rescue, heal, recruit, etc.

  4. #4
    Moderator JCFarnham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    In-Gurrr-Land
    Posts
    1,119
    Reputation
    787
    I would always prefer the exposition to be told the way that has the most emotional immediacy. Perhaps in this instance that would be having it told through someones PoV. I'm not honestly sure what else to tell you, as you'll need to see what works for you... It could go either way to be honest. You could get away with the dialogue just as much as you could with the flashback.

    It's one big massive "That depends". Sorry I'm not being helpful
    Supercritical - The Alchemy of Writing
    Newest post - The Author and The Web [27/01/2013]

  5. #5
    Junior Member void141's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Novi Sad, Serbia
    Posts
    13
    Reputation
    15
    I've never had problems with reading too much dialogue - if you make it easy to read, it doesn't matter how long it is.

    However, what concerns me is this vast knowledge of the incident that your eyewitness possesses. It doesn't seem realistic to me - eyewitnesses not involved in the action rarely have pages of stuff to tell, especially for such a one-scene event as this ambush. Is it possible to maybe make him know less - possibly only the stuff which is plot-related, without too much ornaments - and thus make him talk less?

    This is only guessing, of course, since, from what you have given us, I can't really tell what is the true nature of your eyewitness.
    Last edited by void141; 1-29-12 at 5:57 PM.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Jabrosky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    1,034
    Reputation
    525
    I faced a similar dilemma a short time ago, but have decided to go with the flashback approach. It's preferable to having a long infodumpy dialogue line IMO.

Similar Threads

  1. Greetings from a Flash Fiction writer and enthuisast
    By Leif GS Notae in forum Introductions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-4-11, 3:35 PM
  2. Back Up Your Writing?
    By Black Dragon in forum Writing Questions
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 7-5-11, 1:24 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •