Meg the Healer
Sage
How important is it that authors "kill off" some of their most beloved characters? I know you don't have to, but there are some instances when you really should - not for shock value or just because.
For example, there are two instances that rather bother me because the author stated that they just "couldn't" kill them because they loved them too much.
One is from Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix JK Rowling stated that she couldn't let
die because she loved him too much. The other is from the Twilight Saga Breaking Dawn. Stephanie Meyer couldn't bring herself
and because the deaths of these characters didn't occur, I didn't feel very satisfied by how it all ended (more with Twilight than OOTP).
So should we be able, as an author, to kill off our most treasured characters no matter how much we love them and no matter how much it may "devastate" the reader? Do any of you have a problem or inability to kill off some of your main characters?
For example, there are two instances that rather bother me because the author stated that they just "couldn't" kill them because they loved them too much.
One is from Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix JK Rowling stated that she couldn't let
Arthur Weasley
to kill any of the Cullens, so there is a big build up for a battle that never takes place
So should we be able, as an author, to kill off our most treasured characters no matter how much we love them and no matter how much it may "devastate" the reader? Do any of you have a problem or inability to kill off some of your main characters?
Last edited: