buyjupiter
Maester
I thought this was an interesting point made in the discussion about YA audiences and why authors should try to make more of their stuff at the very least YA-accessible.
I had parents that were, in hindsight, actively involved in my reading choices. I knew where the acceptable boundaries were with reading, and I didn't stray too far out of what my parents had already read. I tended to read the classics of any genre when I was young enough for parental guidance to really matter, and I'm sure that if Anna Karenina had managed to make its way into my book bag at the library when I was 10, my dad would have said I should put it back. (Funnily enough, though, Dickens/Bronte sisters/Wilkie Collins/Arthur Conan Doyle never raised an eyebrow. And thinking about all the horrible life stuff/drug use in *those*...)
The two things that I remember being actively discouraged from reading were Kafka and Slaughterhouse Five. I was 12/13 at the time, so I snuck them out of my parent's library anyways. Now that I'm an adult, I can see that I was waaaaay too young to be reading either. It's not that the subject matter was over my head, but I didn't get why they were important authors.
I don't really recall being recommended anything in particular, except in a general sense. "You have to read the Belgeriad cycle." "You have to read Shannara, it's awesome". "You should read Harry Turtledove, you'll like him".
So, what things have you guys been recommended and/or advised against reading when you were young enough for subject matter to be a concern?
I had parents that were, in hindsight, actively involved in my reading choices. I knew where the acceptable boundaries were with reading, and I didn't stray too far out of what my parents had already read. I tended to read the classics of any genre when I was young enough for parental guidance to really matter, and I'm sure that if Anna Karenina had managed to make its way into my book bag at the library when I was 10, my dad would have said I should put it back. (Funnily enough, though, Dickens/Bronte sisters/Wilkie Collins/Arthur Conan Doyle never raised an eyebrow. And thinking about all the horrible life stuff/drug use in *those*...)
The two things that I remember being actively discouraged from reading were Kafka and Slaughterhouse Five. I was 12/13 at the time, so I snuck them out of my parent's library anyways. Now that I'm an adult, I can see that I was waaaaay too young to be reading either. It's not that the subject matter was over my head, but I didn't get why they were important authors.
I don't really recall being recommended anything in particular, except in a general sense. "You have to read the Belgeriad cycle." "You have to read Shannara, it's awesome". "You should read Harry Turtledove, you'll like him".
So, what things have you guys been recommended and/or advised against reading when you were young enough for subject matter to be a concern?