When the MC isn't the "ONE"

Bring in a Wise Old Counselor to lead the MC down the path he needs to tread. Think Obi-Wan or Gandalf.

 

The focus of the story shouldn't be on the most awesome character or the most powerful character, but the most interesting character. Interesting is most easily achieved via showing him overcoming struggles.

I'd say that it's perfectly fine for the MC to be outshined.

 

I had a similar thing happen in the novel I wrote in September. It started with my MC and protagonist being the six year old girl, but I realized about half way through plotting that it wasn't going to work. If she's my only MC, and everyone else is going to be a supporting character, then it's going to be classified as children's literature. And this story is not suited for a young audience. I would hesitate to say that it's suited for a YA audience, although they could read it and not find much in the way of offensive material. I've just handled adult material that teenagers aren't experienced enough to completely comprehend the awfulness of long term relationship disputes, the loss of a child, etc.

So, I had to shift gears mentally and rewrite a few sections to focus on the mom's journey. I'm most interested in the mother's story and the confrontation/interaction between her and her sister. So that's worked out well for me.

My biggest advice is write about the characters that interest you. If you try and force something that isn't coming together on its own, it's harder to write passionately about the character. Sometimes you discover that you were really trying to write this other story entirely, and those are the best discoveries, in my opinion.

 

Seems to me you should embrace the new character outshining the MC, if only to help you avoid falling into the cliché trap.

 

Characters aren't loved because they're ingenious or brilliant. They're loved if they're multidimensional and that means having both flaws and strengths. Nobody is perfect and I'd say most people have an easier time relating to a character that has flaws. Also, there is no law that prohibits strong (in terms of depth) side characters.

 

Your main character doesn't need to be the most powerful, most interesting, or most anything at all. Your main character is simply the lens through which you observe the events.

For example, think of Napoleon's reign. A story could feature him as the main character. But think of all the other interesting perspectives that could lend you a more interesting story. Perhaps one of his generals, perhaps Napoleon's wife, or a servant in the household. Each of those perspectives would yield an entirely different story, even though the main story elements (battles, coronations, etc) remain the same.

A portion of your book may feature the boy-king as more influential to the events that unfold, but that does not make your MC less of a MC, so long as you keep a focus on telling the story as he experiences it.

 

Hi,

Could I suggest considering Moby Dick, Twenty Thousand Leagues or The Island of Doctor Moreau. The MC isn't the biggest, badest, brightest or most interesting character. He's the observor of these characters, usually at once awed by them and horrified.

It seems to me that your MC could be for these six months or so cast largely in that role, but perhaps also wondering if he did the right thing in unleashing his little bro on the kingdom. It was a high stakes gamble making him king and his inner turmoil could be wondering if he made the right decision and perhaps trying to stay out of the way when he really wants to wade in boots and all and fix the messes. I'd guess that his little bro might be a genius at many things, but has weaknesses elsewhere, like people skills which tend to get in the way.

Cheers, Greg.

 

Two films come to mind:

Marathon Man - look at Dustin Hoffman and Roy Scheider.


Troy - Look at Paris and Hector.

 

To me your problem doesn't seem to be the MC, I think your problem is actually his younger brother. It's okay for the brother to outshine your MC... To some extent. Now this doesn't mean have your MC be a thinly-disguised Superman. Make your characters - including the side ones - have flaws. One way to do this is to put them in different scenarios, even if you never plan to use them in the book. Your MC doesn't have to be the almighty warrior, but he has to be interesting enough to be the MC. If the brother works better as a Main Character, then why not use him? Hoped this helped -Unknown

 

I don't rightfully know, actually. It depends on everything, really. Just go with what you think will work, and if it doesn't, scrap it and start from the last square.

 

I agree with buyjupiter that you should write about characters that interest you. Often the villain is more interesting than the hero especially to write about, I find. You can have an anti-hero as long as he/she has some redeeming quality the reader will identify with. Btw I just read buyjupiter's blog and liked the article about killing a child's teddy bear, and how she, the writer, felt guilty as it was the only thing the child loved. Wow!

 

That depends on how well you establish and integrate it. If it's something that shows up in that one scene, but isn't really reflected in the rest of the story, it won't work. If it's something that doesn't feel relevant to the problems the boy-king faces, that won't work, either (though it sounds like it will be relevant.) If it feels like a natural part of the boy-king's characterization, and it has an effect on the progression of the story, it should work.

On a side note, how does the MC relate to the boy-king? How does he feel about being the parental figure? How does being in this position affect the way he acts and thinks? It's probably a good idea to have the situation affect him as well as the boy-king, just in different ways.