Demesnedenoir
Myth Weaver
Okay, so, here's a link, and this is fun... The AI vs authors results! (part 2)
You can check it out yourself before viewing what Winston thought of the stories. Lawrence used ChatGPT of some sort, I think. See how you score picking out the AI!
While pure AI work is standing out like a sore thumb, Janny Wurts ringing in at 51% boggles my brain. So, the question remains, if a highly successful writer like Wurts can get a score of 51%, what happens when a no name hits the AI radar with this number?
It's also fun to note that Robin Hobb's story also scored less human than some of the AI stories when judged by readers. We are not good at picking out AI, heh heh.
You can check it out yourself before viewing what Winston thought of the stories. Lawrence used ChatGPT of some sort, I think. See how you score picking out the AI!
Story #1: Winston says it's 51%, and it was the MOST "flagged by readers" as AI, and guess what? It's written by Janny Wurts. I'll be damned. I like Janny's work, from what I've read.
Story #2: Winston says 100% Human, and not shockingly, it's human. Chris/Miles Cameron
Story #3: Winston says 18% Human, and it was AI.
Story #4: Out of Credits, but AI
Story #5: Winston says 5%, and it was AI. This is also the AI that scored most human from the AI written pieces, which is interesting.
Story #6: Winston says 100% human, and it is Mark Lawrence.
Story #7: Out of Credits, but AI
Story #8: Winstone says 100% human, Robin Hobb
Story #2: Winston says 100% Human, and not shockingly, it's human. Chris/Miles Cameron
Story #3: Winston says 18% Human, and it was AI.
Story #4: Out of Credits, but AI
Story #5: Winston says 5%, and it was AI. This is also the AI that scored most human from the AI written pieces, which is interesting.
Story #6: Winston says 100% human, and it is Mark Lawrence.
Story #7: Out of Credits, but AI
Story #8: Winstone says 100% human, Robin Hobb
While pure AI work is standing out like a sore thumb, Janny Wurts ringing in at 51% boggles my brain. So, the question remains, if a highly successful writer like Wurts can get a score of 51%, what happens when a no name hits the AI radar with this number?
It's also fun to note that Robin Hobb's story also scored less human than some of the AI stories when judged by readers. We are not good at picking out AI, heh heh.
