- Thread starter
- #41
Not so much a matter of sacredness, but I do believe the integrity of an author's work should be preserved beyond their death. People should be allowed to reimagine and transform works after copyright runs out, but from what I gathered the editors of Dahl's works intended to make their edits the "definitive" version of Dahl's work instead of clearly indicating that they are separate from the originals. I reckon they justify that aim by stating that the edits are only minor, but I don't think such edits should fly for an ostensibly definitive version in any event.
Last edited: