Mad Swede
Auror
OK, now I'm going to be very awkward and say: Sometimes, yes. But only sometimes.Yes. But that's the plot, not the point.
Somehow scanned past this, earlier. When I hear 'you can't force it,' and it's always implied that to do otherwise is stuffing diversity down the reader's throat, as if the act of reading and being in the story is involuntary, what I really hear is, "I don't understand why characters would be any different from me and my expectations and my experiences." And in a world where one can see themselves reflected all around them, in wonderous complexity and variety, why should we "force" the story to hit checkboxes and pander to "those people" who don't fit in that neat little default pigeonhole for the People-shaped.
When we stick to the easy setting where in a land of terror and fantasy everyone looks like Chicago... #SoWhite. One of the most diverse cities in the world apparently only has room for white guys who all do those straight white guy things like casting spells and checking out the sidewalk Boob Carts and Sexy Lamps as they pass. This is all hunky dory with a whole lot of readers. Reading fiction that validates us is incredibly comforting, and when that validation is backed by a sea of media, that stuff's addictive.
Let's repeat that for the folks in the back. Validation is addictive.
So, if we've got Default Man and his coterie of Also Default in Different Flavors doing all the plot and stuff, where does that leave the rest of us? In the background or a subplot if we make the page at all. Another word for this is 'Erasure.' Whether intentional or not, it's still erasing most people from the narrative.
And it gets us into ruts that can be hard to escape. Sometimes we don't even see them, because we aren't reaching beyond this common narrative to see the worlds and the people and the questions that make us work harder. To be better humans humaning with empathy and genuine curiosity for the stories that often don't get told or are left on the cutting room floor.
Some people think that to break open the "I don't want to force things" crowd - also known as the ones too scared of being yelled at to deviate from the pack - the characters should be interrogated about how they and their 'differences' are plot-important enough to get screen time. This is asinine and shorthand for "Give me a reason to not have to work harder for you." It's lazy, and great stories are not told in Easy Mode.
What I do to push past the penguin drop is to flip the question. Does this character need to be white? Straight? PTSD? Neuro-spicey? People-shaped or that horse over there. Why do they need to be male? I ask every time I bring in someone new and follow it with 'he.' Sometimes this gets me into a little trouble, but not often and the rewards are well worth the occasional, "Wait, wasn't he your Straight White Male?" So now we do have some horses that do need to be male, because the King's Champion, also male, is the sort of dick who think the outie somehow makes a crucial difference.
That guy dies.
Push your comfort zone. There will be yelling. In today's culture the increased desire for access to our media creators we will get chewed out for misspelling Nauhuatl or that shirt we wore last week. It's all on the table, and this is very important. We are at a point culturally, artistically, and as creative professionals where if we do it right, if we chuck those chicken feathers and step out as the total bad asses we are, because not everyone can type half a million words and come out the other side the same.
Push it. Force it. No one needs a plot reason to exist, and being able to see ourselves in the stories we experience has a direct, immediate impact on mood and self-esteem. We aren't telling these stories to be edgy or ride a trend. We tell these stories because when we were young, no one wrote them for us, and that cannot be allowed to continue.
We in the west tend to forget how very lucky we are. We live in societies where on the whole we can openly discuss people of different flavours, to use A. E. Lowan's term. So for us including diverse characters is easier and more acceptable. But this isn't true in other parts of the world. There are places, some known to many western tourists, where selling or even possessing one of A. E. Lowan's books (to take an example) could be enough to get you a jail term.
Sometimes subtlety is the best option. Yes, you the author know what this character really is. But you write in a way that the reader has to interpret what the character is, so keeping the book seller and the reader safe from those who would rather not encourage diversity. Writing like this is much harder. But sometimes there isn't a choice.