Ireth
Myth Weaver
A brief bit of backstory: In one of my WIPs, the world the main plot takes place in is one that was created by two dragon deities, the Parents, for their offspring to inhabit. These offspring later went on to create humanity. But the first humans were not sentient, as the young dragons wished, so they asked the Parents to give their creations sentience.
Here's where I'm stuck. The Parents do of course give humans sentience, but I have no idea how the relationship between humans and dragons should play out at first. My first idea was that the Parents should be displeased at their children's presumption to be able to create life; they should give the humans sentience, but also aggression and strong wills, so they would not worship the young dragons as gods. This would give rise to strife and bloodshed between the two species, which the Parents would later regret, but be unable to rectify. (I'm still trying to work out how essentially Stone Age humans would even be able to kill dragons in the first place, but that's a matter for another thread.)
I'm no entirely pleased with that idea, and I wonder whether having the humans initially worship the dragons as gods and demi-gods would be better. But that would lead to the questions of how that arrangement would devolve to how things are in the present, where dragons are seen alternately as bearers of wisdom and guidance, or as savage beasts to be killed, depending on a number of factors from the dragon's physical sex (not necessarily their gender identity; many dragons as well as humans are transgender and intersex) to the human's upbringing. It's typically the female-bodied dragons who are seen as wise, and the male-bodied who are seen as savage. (The former resemble the Eastern dragons of our world, and the latter resemble the Western dragons; this is due to sexual dimorphism, not regional origin.) The main dragon character is MtF transgender, and takes great pains to not be seen as the monster humans think she is.
Thoughts on these ideas, and which one I should go with? Or is there a way I could combine them somehow?
Here's where I'm stuck. The Parents do of course give humans sentience, but I have no idea how the relationship between humans and dragons should play out at first. My first idea was that the Parents should be displeased at their children's presumption to be able to create life; they should give the humans sentience, but also aggression and strong wills, so they would not worship the young dragons as gods. This would give rise to strife and bloodshed between the two species, which the Parents would later regret, but be unable to rectify. (I'm still trying to work out how essentially Stone Age humans would even be able to kill dragons in the first place, but that's a matter for another thread.)
I'm no entirely pleased with that idea, and I wonder whether having the humans initially worship the dragons as gods and demi-gods would be better. But that would lead to the questions of how that arrangement would devolve to how things are in the present, where dragons are seen alternately as bearers of wisdom and guidance, or as savage beasts to be killed, depending on a number of factors from the dragon's physical sex (not necessarily their gender identity; many dragons as well as humans are transgender and intersex) to the human's upbringing. It's typically the female-bodied dragons who are seen as wise, and the male-bodied who are seen as savage. (The former resemble the Eastern dragons of our world, and the latter resemble the Western dragons; this is due to sexual dimorphism, not regional origin.) The main dragon character is MtF transgender, and takes great pains to not be seen as the monster humans think she is.
Thoughts on these ideas, and which one I should go with? Or is there a way I could combine them somehow?
Vala
Maester