Terry Greer
Sage
I guess what i meant - but didn't explain properly - is that if something is replicable - its science - if it isn't reliably replicable then its a belief system and therefore not true - i.e. myth, religion and the 'Occult'.
What follows is that to have a believable occult it needs to have a set of mechanisms and laws that make it effectively a science - without that its unbelievable.
In my view magic without a rule system, where anything can happen, is utterly boring and without suspense. The reader has to be able to forecast what can and can't happen in advance, and the writer has to provide the reader with interesting (and surprising ways) that their protaganist uses these known (and well explained and understood) rules so that the reader thinks 'of course', when the surprise hits them.
What follows is that to have a believable occult it needs to have a set of mechanisms and laws that make it effectively a science - without that its unbelievable.
In my view magic without a rule system, where anything can happen, is utterly boring and without suspense. The reader has to be able to forecast what can and can't happen in advance, and the writer has to provide the reader with interesting (and surprising ways) that their protaganist uses these known (and well explained and understood) rules so that the reader thinks 'of course', when the surprise hits them.
Auror