Voice vs. Grammar

grammar

A few weeks back I wrote an article about Writer’s Voice. I explained my thoughts and experiences and I gave a few examples. One thing that all of these examples had in common is that they took some liberties with what’s normally considered proper grammar.

I thought about commenting on it, but decided against it. The question of whether or not it’s okay to favor voice over grammar – or the other way around – was just too big. I worried it would over shadow all the other things I wanted to say in the article.

Instead, I’ll write about it now.

First, I’ll briefly go over what voice is, and then I’ll talk a little about the purpose of grammar. Finally, I’ll describe my thoughts on what happens when there’s a conflict between voice and grammar.

What is Writer’s Voice?

This can be a big question, so I’ll try and sum it up neatly. Essentially, your writer’s voice is how you express yourself in writing. When you speak you may prefer to use some words over others, and you may use certain expressions a lot. It’s the same in writing, and that’s your writer’s voice.

You can also expand it to encompass the things you like to include in your prose – not necessarily the topics or concepts, but what you choose to describe about a scene or a character. If you have a distinct voice, it may be recognizable to readers across multiple works. There are even writers with a voice so distinct that readers can guess the author just by reading some of their prose, without knowing where it’s from.

A lot more can be said about it, but I think you get the point. Your writer’s voice is how you handle the words of your story.

Why do we need grammar?

Do we even need grammar at all? The way I see it, the main purpose of grammar is to support clarity and understanding. If your prose is written according to some set of rules that your readers are familiar with, it makes it easier for your reader to decipher what you are trying to tell them.

Those rules are called grammar.

I found this quote by professor David Crystal which I feel sums it up nicely.

Grammar is what gives sense to language …. sentences make words yield up their meaning. Sentences actively create sense in language. And the business of the study of sentences is grammar. (Source)

When telling a story, you’ll want your readers to immerse themselves in what you’re telling them. Getting hung up on peculiarities in the wording is a very easy way to break immersion. If you stick with currently accepted grammar rules it’s less likely to happen.

Do keep in mind that following the rules doesn’t guarantee your readers will understand you. Clarity is up to the writer, but grammar is a good tool for achieving it.

Chaos vs Order (Voice vs Grammar)

So, what do you do when your writer’s voice tells you to do one thing, but it goes against the rules of grammar as you know them?

Simple answer: use your own best judgement.

Incidentally, the more complex answer is the same. You have to review what you have written, and you have to decide whether you think the reader will understand you or not. That can be a difficult decision. Don’t just assume the reader will know what you’re thinking.

There is a school of thought that can be summed up with the following statement:

As long as it’s clear what I mean it doesn’t matter how it’s written.

In principle, I can agree with this. After all, the important thing is that the reader understands what you’re trying to tell them, right?

The thing with stories is that there is more to reading them than just understanding the words on the page. I want my reader to be immersed in the story – to get lost in it and get transported to another world. This means they have to understand my words the first time they read them – without pausing to think about what they’re reading.

I think for me as a writer a better expression would be:

As long as the reader can get immersed in the story it doesn’t matter how it’s written.

This puts a bit more responsibility on me as a writer. I have to understand how readers take in the words they’re reading. I have to gauge whether the way I’m expressing myself is easily understood or not.

One way to help gauging this is to know and understand the rules of the grammar you’re using (or abusing). Why do the grammar rules tell you to write in a certain way? If you’re breaking a grammar rule, does it change the meaning of what you’re writing? Does it introduce ambiguity? Does it create confusion?

Why are you doing it?

There are a lot of questions, and some of them can be difficult to answer. Sometimes, it’s enough to go with your gut feeling, and other times that won’t cut it. When it comes to these things, there are no easy answers.

Another thing to keep in mind is that just because you’re trying to maintain a distinct writer’s voice you don’t have to go breaking grammar rules. It’s perfectly doable to stay within the rules and still put your own personal twist on what you’re writing.

Your Opinion

In this article, I went over my definition of voice, and the reason I think it’s important to be aware of the rules for grammar. I also explained my thoughts about what to do when voice and grammar come into conflict with each other. Does this make sense to you? Do you have another opinion?

Some writers just throw the rulebook out the window and write whichever way they feel like. Sometimes it works, and sometimes it doesn’t. How do you feel about that? Have you tried it, and how did it work out?

There’s a common saying that goes somewhere along the lines of: You have to understand the rules before you can break them. Do you agree with this? If you’re not going to stick to the rules, why bother learning them in the first place?

Nils Ödlund is a writing and fantasy enthusiast. He's currently chipping away at a series of novellas about the adventures of two shape shifters and a paladin, while at the same time trying to crack the secrets of storytelling. Ödlund lives in Cork, Ireland. When not writing, he enjoys exploring the countryside on foot, and when the weather gets too bad he'll stay home and play games on the computer (or write some more). You can follow Ödlund on his blog (link just above) where he mostly posts pictures of coffee, beer, and the Irish countryside, as well as the occasional update on his writing progress.

17
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Jennifer D
Guest
Jennifer D

I think you can have both. I do enjoy reading authors who write characters realistically – including the way they might talk. We all now people don’t always use proper grammar when talking in real life.

Vicki Wootton
Guest
Vicki Wootton

That’s a given. People don’t talk grammatically. If the did the dialogue would sound stilted and unnatural. But I still maintain that narrative needs to be written with correct grammar in order to be understood by most readers. Bad grammar causes distraction,irritation for the reader, stumbling blocks.

shaun wright
Guest
shaun wright

I often think that our writing can be compared to songwriting where the writer’s voice doesn’t always follow proper grammar. Sometimes the best way to write is to use your own judgement and consider the reader.

Vicki Wootton
Guest
Vicki Wootton

One should respect one’s readers by using proper grammar instead of insulting them by assuming they are illiterate.

Britanica
Guest
Britanica

Understanding the rules is one thing, but you have to follow them to have experience. I feel like after you understand them you can work with them rather than break them thus creating something bigger than a simple story. You make a piece of art that truly fascinates and moves your reader.

K. Gerard
Guest
K. Gerard

I kind of disagree with the statement that one has to understand the rules before he can break them… How many rules have we already broken in a foreign country without realizing? It’s the audience’s understanding of the rules that matters. Some expects conversational grammar, some are grammar nazis. You should write in the way you want to. Even if it’s a little broken, it is your style. And only your own style conveys your story the best.

Woelf Dietrich
Guest
Woelf Dietrich

I agree with the writer. It is said you’re allowed to break the rules as long as you know what rules you are breaking and why. That is fine, but I know the safer route is to hold on to them because that is what the reader will do, normally. And yet, at the same time, you need to do what is best for the story. You have to write in a way that best brings out the full flavour of the story, whatever that means or entails.

I’m still learning. I’ll always be learning. When I write I pretty much puke out the words, and then once everything is out, I apply the rules of grammar. One of my weaknesses is using too many or too few commas, for instance. I write to a rhythm in my head, which means I have my own weird pauses in a sentence, almost like Walken. That doesn’t mean it makes my story readable, and that, I think, is the test to beat all tests. My humble two cents.

Nicholas Rossis
Guest
Nicholas Rossis

One of my favorite sayings is, don’t let your writing get in the way of your story. Having said that, quite a few writers seem to break the rules out of sheer ignorance – not because of conscious choice. Which is fine, as long as the reader remains immersed in the story,as you rightly point out.

Vicki Wootton
Guest
Vicki Wootton

I agree wholeheartedly with this statement: You have to understand the rules before you can break them.
The problem I frequently encounter when reading the work of indie writers is that they don’t know the rules at all. This makes it very hard to read their prose. Every time I encounter a grammatical error, the misuse of a word, or the mismatch between subject and pronoun, I stop reading abruptly and sink into a silent rant. It’s like smacking up against a wall. After a few smacks in the face, I discard the story. The bad grammar is too painful, no matter how compelling the plot.
I’m sure many readers find this acceptable because this is the way most of them talk, but I think written narrative needs more care, otherwise the language will descend into a chaotic free-for-all in which all meaning will be lost.
The rules may differ slightly in dialogue, however.

Tom Malloy
Guest
Tom Malloy

I feel this conflict in my characters’ dialogue all the time. I feel their dialogue sparkles when they speak like people speak (without strict grammar–any taped conversation will demonstrate that people speak in broken, often interrupted, sometimes incomplete sentences). My first draft is usually guided by my ear, that is, the dialogue is more or less like the speech I hear. As I revise, I usually give in to grammar to some degree not because I want to follow the rules as because I want the dialogue to communicate precise meaning to the reader and that often doesn’t happen with natural sounding dialogue. (Same is true for people speaking: The casual, mildly ungrammatical nature of speaking often leads to misunderstanding.)

So for me, natural dialogue vs grammatical dialogue is a constant creative tension. Sometime I lean more one way and other times more the other way.

Antonio del Drago
Admin
Antonio del Drago

Personally, I have a hard time with writing that breaks (or stretches) the rules of grammar. I find it somewhat grating and distracting, like nails on a chalkboard.

This fact may be due to my upbringing, however. I had correct grammar drilled into me in school, and anything that deviates from that sets off an internal alarm.

This site uses XenWord.