Futhark
Inkling
I am a systems orientated person. I like to know the why’s, wherefore’s and how-to’s. Parameters, extrapolations and exceptions. Expected inputs and outputs. You get the idea. Now, I’m of the opinion that a work of fantasy can be too realistic. If it reads like a text book then I would rather read history because truth is often stranger than fiction. I don’t want to create that. I want fantasy elements. Powers, monsters, magic. But I wanted it to make sense, to be able to explain all of it. So I did. To describe simplistically, I introduced one fantastic, whimsical, unexplainable event in the distant past and extrapolated from there. This provided me all of the parameters I needed to create my fantasy world, from the magic system to gods to aberrations. Sure it excluded some things I wanted, but that’s how the cookie crumbled.
My trou de loup (excuse my French (and my bad pun)) is that now I’m creating characters for this fantasy world, they (or rather I) don’t see it as fantastic. Everything is explained. I know they don’t know that, but I’m struggling to bring the wonder back to the show, because I know how the magician does his tricks beforehand.
So the question is, how do I put the genie back in the bottle? How do I put the wonder and awe back into the world?
My trou de loup (excuse my French (and my bad pun)) is that now I’m creating characters for this fantasy world, they (or rather I) don’t see it as fantastic. Everything is explained. I know they don’t know that, but I’m struggling to bring the wonder back to the show, because I know how the magician does his tricks beforehand.
So the question is, how do I put the genie back in the bottle? How do I put the wonder and awe back into the world?