Gurkhal
Auror
So I have a question.
Say, as an example, that I want to include heraldry, as roughly used in Western Europe during the High Middle Ages, in a setting which is distinctly not Western Europe in the High Middle Ages and otherwise tries to cleave closely to historical realities. How extensively would you feel the author's explanation for this has to be to make sense and keep the disbelief going?
Two examples below.
Say that I want to have essentially Vikings but them to have a system of clan/family symbols and colors to identify themselves on their shields, banners, jewelry, clothing etc.?
Or have a nation inspired by one from Antiquity, say the Samnites or Etruscans, which would use locality-based symbols and colors on their shields but the nobles families would have their own symbols and color combinations on their shields and the shields of their direct dependents.
In neither case would there be the kind of social and cultural surroundings that gave rise to heraldry in the real world but it would boil down to: author likes heraldry and thinks it would be useful and cool in the story thus its included.
Would you, as a reader, think that Rule of Cool is sufficient or would you want the author to be able to explain why this element is present in a setting/story that otherwise cleaves very close to the historical realities of the cultures being used for inspiration?
Say, as an example, that I want to include heraldry, as roughly used in Western Europe during the High Middle Ages, in a setting which is distinctly not Western Europe in the High Middle Ages and otherwise tries to cleave closely to historical realities. How extensively would you feel the author's explanation for this has to be to make sense and keep the disbelief going?
Two examples below.
Say that I want to have essentially Vikings but them to have a system of clan/family symbols and colors to identify themselves on their shields, banners, jewelry, clothing etc.?
Or have a nation inspired by one from Antiquity, say the Samnites or Etruscans, which would use locality-based symbols and colors on their shields but the nobles families would have their own symbols and color combinations on their shields and the shields of their direct dependents.
In neither case would there be the kind of social and cultural surroundings that gave rise to heraldry in the real world but it would boil down to: author likes heraldry and thinks it would be useful and cool in the story thus its included.
Would you, as a reader, think that Rule of Cool is sufficient or would you want the author to be able to explain why this element is present in a setting/story that otherwise cleaves very close to the historical realities of the cultures being used for inspiration?

Myth Weaver
Maester
Dreamer