Velka
Sage
Yeah, Velka, I hear you. I know there are a bunch of fear voices in my head, and it isn't that I don't see it, but the problem is, I'm striving to be "professional" and so my aim is to write "like professionals" not like myself .... Why does my work not look and feel like a published authors'? Is it as good? What makes it good enough? At what point do you know you're doing fine?
Hah! This reminds me of a conversation I had with a friend the other day. We both couldn't believe we were adults. Like real bonafide, tax paying, career having, house owning, adults. When I was younger I always thought that adults totally had their shit together; they knew what they were doing and had this whole life thing figured out.
Well... now that I'm in my mid (I guess now late, ) 30s I've found (most) adults still really have no clue what they're doing. Look at me I'm an adult busy adulting over here! I still drink milk out of the carton, only do laundry when I run out of underwear, dump a shoebox of tax stuff at the accountant with a shrug and the opinion that I'm paying them to figure this out, stay up too late playing video games, and eat too much candy.
I'm pretty sure it's the same for many writers. Neil Gaiman talked about still having imposter syndrome, where one day someone with a clipboard would knock on his door and tell him the gig is up and he'd have to go and get a serious desk job.
Why does my work not look and feel like a published authors'?
Like Skip.Knox said, perhaps the next step is to pay earth-monies for a real published author editor. You can ask us bumbling fools what we like and don't like about your work all you want, but we're just individual reader voices. Someone whose job is to help get work to the standard that publishers want can probably give much better advice than the peanut gallery.
Also, remember that no published work is perfect. I loved The Lies of Locke Lamora too, but there were structural issues to it (one that pulled me out of the book altogether for a moment), some flimsy character stuff, a few plot holes, etc. Was it a perfect book? Heavens no and if Scott Lynch asked me to beta it I would have tore him a new one pointing all that out. Did I still enjoy it and read the next two books? Hell yes.
Some people not liking some things about your work doesn't mean it sucks as a whole. You can't please them all.