Fyri
Inkling
This thought came during the discussion of beauty and how many people write orcs differently these days.
Back when vampires were all the rage because of Twilight, we saw all sorts of renditions. In researching the creature and the history for my own needs, I found out that the word vampire actually comes partially from Vrykolakas, which can mean ghoul, werewolf, and/or vampire!
Thus, we have your mainstream vampire (coffin, bat, sunlight burns, suck blood, no garlic), but we also have thousands of original variations, some leaning closer to the mixed origins.
Fae also see this. Is fae a single species or a multitude of races? We can see anything from tiny pixie tinkerbells to the Seelie and Unseelie to tall nature-bound elves. I've seen arguements that tiny dragonfly fairies are not fairies. Then you have faerie vs fairy vs pixie, but one may also argue it's all the same thing. Maleficent is also technically a faerie, though looks more demon than traditional faerie.
Perhaps this is because the origins of many myths are more clouded than they are defined.
Thus, we pose the question to discuss:
How far can you twist a known mythical creature until it is unrecognizable as that known creature?
But perhaps that in itself is too vague. Does each creature have a unique limit for twisting their terms? Surely dragons are more defined than the fae. Or are they? We have eastern and western dragons. Water, fire, poison... (side comment: Why the heck is Charizard not a dragon?)
This could probably be a whole college course.
Also up for discussion here, since it was specific to the other thread: What makes an orc an orc?
Back when vampires were all the rage because of Twilight, we saw all sorts of renditions. In researching the creature and the history for my own needs, I found out that the word vampire actually comes partially from Vrykolakas, which can mean ghoul, werewolf, and/or vampire!
Thus, we have your mainstream vampire (coffin, bat, sunlight burns, suck blood, no garlic), but we also have thousands of original variations, some leaning closer to the mixed origins.
Fae also see this. Is fae a single species or a multitude of races? We can see anything from tiny pixie tinkerbells to the Seelie and Unseelie to tall nature-bound elves. I've seen arguements that tiny dragonfly fairies are not fairies. Then you have faerie vs fairy vs pixie, but one may also argue it's all the same thing. Maleficent is also technically a faerie, though looks more demon than traditional faerie.
Perhaps this is because the origins of many myths are more clouded than they are defined.
Thus, we pose the question to discuss:
How far can you twist a known mythical creature until it is unrecognizable as that known creature?
But perhaps that in itself is too vague. Does each creature have a unique limit for twisting their terms? Surely dragons are more defined than the fae. Or are they? We have eastern and western dragons. Water, fire, poison... (side comment: Why the heck is Charizard not a dragon?)
This could probably be a whole college course.
Also up for discussion here, since it was specific to the other thread: What makes an orc an orc?