Feo Takahari
Auror
I guess if everyone's talking about intelligence, I might as well talk more about my personal experience of it. It feels really arrogant to talk in these terms, but I guess it's less arrogant if I'm honest and straightforward about it.
I do above average on most tests of intelligence that don't involve memory, and very, very well at tests that relate to solving problems in an ordered and logical fashion. This is actually a very limited talent--how many of the things you do are based on ordered logic?--but it can come up in some interesting contexts, like beating a video game by determining what rules the AI always follows, or getting a good score on a multiple choice test by eliminating all the answers that are illogical.
This does not mean I have any talent for lateral thinking. In fact, I'm terrible at it. I conceive of a logical puzzle with a logical solution according to the bounds of the problem I've been given, and if the solution is outside the expected bounds, I often find myself stumped.
Nor does it give me any boost to memorization. I can learn a bit faster if the things I'm learning are logical, but the more things I have to learn at once, the harder it is for me to keep them all straight, and the more likely I am to trip over myself. (For instance, I failed in my attempts to learn Spanish, because I got mixed up while trying to keep track of all the different words I was supposed to be learning.)
Above all, I do not have any inherent talent for outthinking or manipulating anyone who can see what I'm doing. If they've already done their planning, I can recognize and respond to the patterns in their plans, but if they see my response, they can adapt to counter it, and I'm back at square one. (In particular, I am horrendous at chess.)
I'm not sure whether I qualify as a "genius." I'm certainly not a scholastic genius--I get worse grades than people who're great at memorizing and regurgitating facts and figures. Nor am I a genius at any form of competition. I just have a semi-useful ability that I've never really had to work for.
(I would like to think I'm an artistic genius, but that's for readers to determine . . .)
I do above average on most tests of intelligence that don't involve memory, and very, very well at tests that relate to solving problems in an ordered and logical fashion. This is actually a very limited talent--how many of the things you do are based on ordered logic?--but it can come up in some interesting contexts, like beating a video game by determining what rules the AI always follows, or getting a good score on a multiple choice test by eliminating all the answers that are illogical.
This does not mean I have any talent for lateral thinking. In fact, I'm terrible at it. I conceive of a logical puzzle with a logical solution according to the bounds of the problem I've been given, and if the solution is outside the expected bounds, I often find myself stumped.
Nor does it give me any boost to memorization. I can learn a bit faster if the things I'm learning are logical, but the more things I have to learn at once, the harder it is for me to keep them all straight, and the more likely I am to trip over myself. (For instance, I failed in my attempts to learn Spanish, because I got mixed up while trying to keep track of all the different words I was supposed to be learning.)
Above all, I do not have any inherent talent for outthinking or manipulating anyone who can see what I'm doing. If they've already done their planning, I can recognize and respond to the patterns in their plans, but if they see my response, they can adapt to counter it, and I'm back at square one. (In particular, I am horrendous at chess.)
I'm not sure whether I qualify as a "genius." I'm certainly not a scholastic genius--I get worse grades than people who're great at memorizing and regurgitating facts and figures. Nor am I a genius at any form of competition. I just have a semi-useful ability that I've never really had to work for.
(I would like to think I'm an artistic genius, but that's for readers to determine . . .)