Miskatonic
Auror
I'd say a lot of the Final Fantasy video games would be good examples of science fantasy.
is able to perform acts that seem impossible when you don't know the explanation? Would that have to be a fantasy then?
I know there are a lot of die hard sci fi readers who will only accept that "hard sci fi" which is at least 99% scientifically accurate be considered sci fi, but unfortunately for you I don't think that you're in the majority.
You don't consider a novel that is mostly science fiction but has some fantasy tropes as well science fantasy? And you're basing that opinion off Star Wars? How can you possibly tell without more detail? There are plenty of fantasy tropes that wouldn't transform a book into a fantasy automatically. For instance, a book set in the far future where there are aliens and space ships and technologically advanced weapons but where the main character carries a sword and is able to perform acts that seem impossible when you don't know the explanation? Would that have to be a fantasy then?
I don't know how you got all this from my comment. Doesn't really matter what tropes are in it. Whether it has a sword is no dispositive of fantasy. I can write a modern thriller with a sword in it. It's more a question of whether what happens in the story is consistent with what we understand of science or, if inconsistent, provided with a plausible, rational underpinning as to why the inconsistency exists. If it just hand-waves everything, it's more like fantasy (see, again, Star Wars, midichlorians notwithstanding).
Then you've no basis for rejecting stories in general that are mostly sci fi with some fantasy tropes included as not being "science fantasy". Which is what you did.
No, that's your misreading of my posts. I said science fantasy is fantasy, with the word science thrown in front of it for reasons like "it's in space." If it is science fiction but has a fantasy trope (like swords and armor), then it is science fiction, not science fantasy, and therefore outside of the category of works I was talking about.
When I said I don't consider "that stuff" science fiction, I was talking about science fantasy. I said science fantasy was just fantasy with the word science. You said it was just as likely to be science fiction with fantasy trope. I don't agree, because I call the latter science fiction even if it has a sword or a castle).
If it looks like SF but has wizards lobbing fireballs around in the form of spells, with no rationale explanation, it's still fantasy.
I see. Then we just disagree on the definition. As I said, I don't think your definition covers all of the stories that fall under the name of science fantasy. Because it's a marketing tool. It's meant to describe the kind of experience a reader will have if they read the book. A story with a sci fi basis, but including a bunch of fantasy tropes as well, is a different experience than a basic sci fi story. The term is meant to distinguish that.
Yeah I was looking for a sort of modern version of that. It's a shame we only ever get to see a return to these things only as homages rather than original attempts at making somethingAre you looking for Sword and Planet? That is the sub-genre I most consider the definition of Science Fantasy. You mentioned the pulpy… so I'm thinking you mean the 1950-60's style like John Carter of Mars? Where the hero is either a time traveller, or a crashed astronaut onto another planet where they are stuck in Babylonian times and have 'some' advanced technology, or form of magic or sorcery? Usually with sacrificial virgins, power hungry sorcerer priests, large alien creatures/monsters, and a magic system that makes no sense?
That is a pretty old school genre, but I love it. I would love to see it brought back.
Thank you!!! Drop all the B.S. and just write what you love. The world today is broken. Find a passion for something real, make what you want of it. No one just writes for the love of it and from a passion anylonger. Good stories stay with you. To class and sub class and worry about this data and that focus group, and these people over there. Naw, no, nope.Are the Barsoom stories called science fantasy now? That's another example of applying labels in hindsight then, because when A Princess of Mars was published it was simply considered pulp fiction or adventure. Later on, when its success had spawned a lot more stories like it, it was called planetary romance.
Sometimes, I think subgenres are more limiting than they are helpful.