- Thread starter
- #21
They are just walking and walking, and then walking some more, and then someone throws upas if Tolkien created a rich world but forgot to write a compelling plot
They are just walking and walking, and then walking some more, and then someone throws upas if Tolkien created a rich world but forgot to write a compelling plot
I don't follow your first question.But if they are not offensively violent and not gaming, because they are the savage side of the human? More animal like.
My idea of orc males are that they challenge each other to show bravery and strength, but weaker orcs are just trampled. Like the weaker wolf or monkey in the pack, the weakest orc is pushed down and threatened all the time.
If a human male comes, they kill and eat him if he shows weakness, but of he shows strength they fight him one on one to see how strong he is compared to them.
I am thinking of the stereotype of nomadic step people, shitting and pissing in the saddle in their pants, spitting and drooling when they eat, always cursing and growling and either punching or killing someone, or challenging someone equal or better.
It is the masculine when it has no actual strength, just the violent savage part.
What would the corresponding of the feminine be? I don't want it to be the same as the male, and I also don't want it to be social, or in any way intelligent.
My story will use the unreliable narrator, so in-story facts are conflicting, but the essence of my orc is of savage wild spirit. Think of indigenous people like north american indians or maoris, but without the cultural and religious part, only the hunting and the sneaking and the warring.
For example, there is a tribe of humans who are driven into a never ending desert, and they bring with them a water sprite of sorts, a very minor female deity of a stream or a spring of their homeland, that will grow into a major goddess as they discover (or somehow dig or make) wells/springs and oasis. That water sprite in reality is a female orc.
But if I cannot come up with an archetype of a savage animalistic femininity that is not violent and not gossiping, I will do it in another way, and just have male orcs and no females.
Yeah...but there must be another aspect of being animalistic and uncivilized, and not only being violentcause she's savage, cruel, and wants to maintain her place in the social order
The interesting thing here is that the Lord of the Rings is told from the perspective of the hobbits. And they don't know what will happen if Sauron gets the ring, they only know it will be bad. Since they don't know, the reader doesn't know either. While it's likely enough that Tolkien himself didn't know exactly, it's something that is very much in character and matching the story.Interesting btw Lord of the rings. I have never come to understand how the ring makes Sauron stronger. I think Tolkien had quite a few holes in his story.
Okey yes, but then there is the council in Riverdale, isn't that "filmed" in the book without the hobbits? It's been a while since I read the books, 25 years or something. Maybe it would have been more interesting with not the pov of the hobbits. Some parts are so boring. When Sam is tired and whining and Frodo is depressed, and it just goes on and on.And they don't know what will happen if Sauron gets the ring, they only know it will be bad
No, I probably was not clear.Since she is Orc, and in an Orc society, maybe she makes weapons
There is The Last Ringbearer, where the story is told from an Orcs PoV.Okey yes, but then there is the council in Riverdale, isn't that "filmed" in the book without the hobbits? It's been a while since I read the books, 25 years or something. Maybe it would have been more interesting with not the pov of the hobbits. Some parts are so boring. When Sam is tired and whining and Frodo is depressed, and it just goes on and on.
A really interesting take would be a gnostic version, where Gandalf and Galadriel and all of them are the bad guys, suppressing Sauron who is one of the elves who never went to the Valar-land. Sauron wants to build something for the local elves, but Gandalf is sent to stop him, and the hobbits and the humans are all lied to about who is really the bad guys. Just like real life politics. Sauron is just a nationalist, "this land is elf land!" And the globalist elves who are allies of the valar all go, "they are not even elves! They are orcs! Fight them! Give them no respite!"
One of the hobbits realize this truth, and Gandalf and Galadriel tells him that it is the whispers of Sauron.
The same with Saruman: Sauron finally gets him to see the reality of the situation, he lets some of the eastern elves stay in his fortress and build a resistance army against the globalists, but no, Gandalf comes there and sends tree monsters to fight them.
The story ends with the good guys, the ones who stand up and actually do something, and fight for the little guy, all are defeated, and the globalists win.
The end scene is Galadriel saying to Sam Gamgi "Bugs are really not that bad! They are actually quite good. Here, have a fly I just swatted with my elf quickness"
I mean how do animals live in the wild. The males and females usually pair up for mating and divide labor until the young aren't around and then back to fending for themselves. If the male is killed the female goes hunting. The female might fatten up to be able to produce more milk without hunting in prep. She might also go into heat.