BWFoster78
Myth Weaver
When I finished the 4th draft of my novel, I honestly thought I'd send it to the editor; she'd make a couple of minor comments but offer mainly praise; and I'd hit "Publish" on Amazon.
Let's just say that that wasn't what happened.
A long while and a complete rewrite later, I'm reflecting on that experience.
Looking back at the manuscript through the lens of the editor's comments - Most of the scenes had zero tension; the ending was horrid; and, by the end of the book, the epic fantasy became a YA romantic drama. And those are just some of the highlights of the dreadfulness.
First thought: maybe I just didn't know any better. Maybe I had zero taste back then, and, now that my eyes have been opened, I have more taste.
Possible, but I don't think that's it. I was able, even then, to identify similar issues in books that I didn't write. In fact, I am absolutely positive that, if I suffered a hit to the head that caused me amnesia, I would have hated my 4th draft even at that moment of submission.
So why couldn't I see that then?
Here's my hypothesis:
Writing is the act of using the words to translate the pictures/emotions in my head to create pictures/emotions in the head of readers. When I read my writing, however, the words serve to remind me of the pictures/emotions that already exist. No creation of pictures/emotions is necessary.
Thoughts? Does the hypothesis ring true? Has this been your experience?
THE BIG QUESTION:
How do I ever get to the point where I can trust my own judgment about my writing?
Thanks.
Brian
Let's just say that that wasn't what happened.
A long while and a complete rewrite later, I'm reflecting on that experience.
Looking back at the manuscript through the lens of the editor's comments - Most of the scenes had zero tension; the ending was horrid; and, by the end of the book, the epic fantasy became a YA romantic drama. And those are just some of the highlights of the dreadfulness.
First thought: maybe I just didn't know any better. Maybe I had zero taste back then, and, now that my eyes have been opened, I have more taste.
Possible, but I don't think that's it. I was able, even then, to identify similar issues in books that I didn't write. In fact, I am absolutely positive that, if I suffered a hit to the head that caused me amnesia, I would have hated my 4th draft even at that moment of submission.
So why couldn't I see that then?
Here's my hypothesis:
Writing is the act of using the words to translate the pictures/emotions in my head to create pictures/emotions in the head of readers. When I read my writing, however, the words serve to remind me of the pictures/emotions that already exist. No creation of pictures/emotions is necessary.
Thoughts? Does the hypothesis ring true? Has this been your experience?
THE BIG QUESTION:
How do I ever get to the point where I can trust my own judgment about my writing?
Thanks.
Brian