BWFoster78
Myth Weaver
If I ever achieve success as an author, I think I'll look back and say that the biggest thing I did right was to set a clear goal as to what I wanted to achieve. The goal isn't about how many books I want to sell or how many words I want to write. It's about what I want my writing to be like, what I want it to accomplish.
I started by considering carefully the books I most enjoy. What traits do they have in common? Why do I like them? By examining the commonalities, I determined there are two things I like, and I used those two characteristics to set my goal.
I want my books to:
1. Be engaging. I want my reader to have a hard time putting my book down, and, when they're forced to do just that, I want every second that they're away to be agonizing. I want them to put down the book and say, "That was fun!"
2. Evoke an emotional response. I want the reader to care about the characters so much that they experience what the characters are feeling.
Since I know what I want to achieve, all I have to do is figure out how to achieve it. To make my writing engaging, I determined the three following factors/techniques to be of the utmost importance (not to say that the same result can't be achieved by pursuing a different path, but I think this is the way for me to achieve it):
1. Tension, tension, and more tension.
2. Clear, tight writing.
3. Good control of pacing.
Making the writing engaging seems to be, by far, the easier of the two goals. I find many more books that achieve this goal than the emotional one and that I more easily achieve it in my own work. As far as I can tell, the three main factors/techniques involved in evoking emotion are:
1. Relatable characters.
2. Deep POV.
3. Not sure yet. I'll let you know when I figure it out. I think it has something to do with building to a climatic moment, but I'm not exactly sure if that's exactly what I mean or how it's accomplished.
Setting such goals, I believe, has the following advantages:
1. It's efficient. Writing well demands mastery of a lot of techniques. By narrowing down the definition of "well," I've focused in on the ones I need to work on first.
2. It gives me some idea of my audience. I'm not a marketing guy, but a piece of advice that I read over and over is that you need to know your audience. I have little idea of such, which concerns me greatly. I do know, however, that my audience likes books that meet these two goals. (I realize, of course, that I've created something of a tautology with this reasoning
)
3. It gives me a measuring stick for "good enough." We've discussed on this board the meaning and the importance of "good enough" a lot lately. Determining this nebulous criterion is made much simpler for me by being able to say, "It's good enough if it achieves at least one of my two goals."
4. I think it will help me stay focused. When I gain more experience writing, I'll get better at determining story ideas that have more mass market appeal, and I'll discover new and exciting techniques with which I want to experiment. By keeping these two goals sharply in focus, though, I won't lose sight of who I want to be as a writer.
I get that I'm more analytical than most writers, and, perhaps contrary to the way I come across, I don't think, when it comes to creative process, that you have to do something a certain way. However, I do feel that this issue is important enough that, if you're not an established author, it may be beneficial for you to step back and ask yourself what you're trying to achieve.
All that to say, "What are you trying to achieve with your writing and how do you plan to get there?"
Thanks,
Brian
I started by considering carefully the books I most enjoy. What traits do they have in common? Why do I like them? By examining the commonalities, I determined there are two things I like, and I used those two characteristics to set my goal.
I want my books to:
1. Be engaging. I want my reader to have a hard time putting my book down, and, when they're forced to do just that, I want every second that they're away to be agonizing. I want them to put down the book and say, "That was fun!"
2. Evoke an emotional response. I want the reader to care about the characters so much that they experience what the characters are feeling.
Since I know what I want to achieve, all I have to do is figure out how to achieve it. To make my writing engaging, I determined the three following factors/techniques to be of the utmost importance (not to say that the same result can't be achieved by pursuing a different path, but I think this is the way for me to achieve it):
1. Tension, tension, and more tension.
2. Clear, tight writing.
3. Good control of pacing.
Making the writing engaging seems to be, by far, the easier of the two goals. I find many more books that achieve this goal than the emotional one and that I more easily achieve it in my own work. As far as I can tell, the three main factors/techniques involved in evoking emotion are:
1. Relatable characters.
2. Deep POV.
3. Not sure yet. I'll let you know when I figure it out. I think it has something to do with building to a climatic moment, but I'm not exactly sure if that's exactly what I mean or how it's accomplished.
Setting such goals, I believe, has the following advantages:
1. It's efficient. Writing well demands mastery of a lot of techniques. By narrowing down the definition of "well," I've focused in on the ones I need to work on first.
2. It gives me some idea of my audience. I'm not a marketing guy, but a piece of advice that I read over and over is that you need to know your audience. I have little idea of such, which concerns me greatly. I do know, however, that my audience likes books that meet these two goals. (I realize, of course, that I've created something of a tautology with this reasoning
3. It gives me a measuring stick for "good enough." We've discussed on this board the meaning and the importance of "good enough" a lot lately. Determining this nebulous criterion is made much simpler for me by being able to say, "It's good enough if it achieves at least one of my two goals."
4. I think it will help me stay focused. When I gain more experience writing, I'll get better at determining story ideas that have more mass market appeal, and I'll discover new and exciting techniques with which I want to experiment. By keeping these two goals sharply in focus, though, I won't lose sight of who I want to be as a writer.
I get that I'm more analytical than most writers, and, perhaps contrary to the way I come across, I don't think, when it comes to creative process, that you have to do something a certain way. However, I do feel that this issue is important enough that, if you're not an established author, it may be beneficial for you to step back and ask yourself what you're trying to achieve.
All that to say, "What are you trying to achieve with your writing and how do you plan to get there?"
Thanks,
Brian