Bropocalypse
Dreamer
I use either, neither, or both at once, depending on what I feel.
It can be fun to explore, refine, and reinvent the standard fantasy stock of races, to put new twists on what is commonly depicted or to deconstruct it. It's also fun to invent things from scratch. To make a people from nothing, wind them up, see where they go. "I made that." You can go somewhere in between, using motifs of an old idea but needing to use a new name when your changes deviate so far as to render them a new species. Or you can invent something new and give them the same name as an old idea, to save a reader time. This is helpful when a shape evolves independently of what you expected, and you end up with an old idea with a wholly new origin.
I should certainly hope so. There's no necessary reason to invent a race for the sake of a group for the sake of a behavior. Within a single larger ethnicity you can have subgroups: Let's imagine two stereotypical depictions of English people: Posh Oxfordians and Cockney Soccer Hooligans. Neither of those two things are (necessarily) what any single member of them might choose to associate with, but each has a grouping and a subculture within that larger group, and a set of behaviors you might expect to see from either. Of course, each member is absolutely free to subvert your expectations, and there's nothing to say that any given member is likewise definitely going to follow your expectations. But, as a whole, you might notice a trend of behaviors in them due to their subcultural influences.
It can be fun to explore, refine, and reinvent the standard fantasy stock of races, to put new twists on what is commonly depicted or to deconstruct it. It's also fun to invent things from scratch. To make a people from nothing, wind them up, see where they go. "I made that." You can go somewhere in between, using motifs of an old idea but needing to use a new name when your changes deviate so far as to render them a new species. Or you can invent something new and give them the same name as an old idea, to save a reader time. This is helpful when a shape evolves independently of what you expected, and you end up with an old idea with a wholly new origin.
I mean, what are you going to do when you only use humans but you need a group of big, ugly warriors? Is there a not-racist way to go about this?
I should certainly hope so. There's no necessary reason to invent a race for the sake of a group for the sake of a behavior. Within a single larger ethnicity you can have subgroups: Let's imagine two stereotypical depictions of English people: Posh Oxfordians and Cockney Soccer Hooligans. Neither of those two things are (necessarily) what any single member of them might choose to associate with, but each has a grouping and a subculture within that larger group, and a set of behaviors you might expect to see from either. Of course, each member is absolutely free to subvert your expectations, and there's nothing to say that any given member is likewise definitely going to follow your expectations. But, as a whole, you might notice a trend of behaviors in them due to their subcultural influences.