Semi-Random Cover Design Thoughts

I like the Dean Koontz one (though I'm not sure I'd click for it because it looks like not my genre), but I agree that I would not pay 2k for that. For that kind of money I would want something a lot less Photoshop and a lot more custom art. The only difficult part for the Koontz cover is coming up with the idea. Even more so because I guess that even the font is set for someone like him (his name will look the same on all covers).

My main issue with the Game of Thrones one would be that the title is hard to read, especially thumbnail size. It does draw the eye and it might make some browsers pause, so I guess that works.

As for covers in general, I don't have any specific ones. But a general comment, I really dislike the current trend (which is even more common for indie books) is to have a single, bright character photoshopped over some random background. Almost all of them look bad. I understand that they're cheap and easy to make, but I just don't like them at all.

 

A good question. Watch how I dodge it.

<nerd>
The GOT cover I think is truly awful. Back in the day when I learned film photography, that type of graphic was heavily criticised for having neither strong blacks nor whites: This type of image was generally seen as a signature of a photographer with limited experience or who was more used to working in colour. It would be dismissively referred to as a 'grey and gray' (ok, I know it's blue tinted) rather than a 'black and white' and the poor student would be sent to reprint it 'properly'.
</nerd>

...but most people don't care about rules like that. We were the sort of people who argued over which photo paper produced the 'truest black'. Book buyers generally aren't. I genuinely think it could be improved by dialling the contrast up so that the blacks were a punchy, deep black and the whites shone through (and putting in some more dramatic clouds to balance the larger gap this would create between elements) but you've picked it out as a favourite. A book buyer picking something and saying ‘that attracts me’ is the whole point and trumps any analysis.

Anyhoo, my initial reaction just got me thinking about how as people who have probably thought about cover design, or even tried our hand at it, we've probably all taken on various rules and looked at more than our fair share. I don’t know if I can objectively look at a cover and simply be attracted without going into some over-the-top rundown of how well it conforms to various best practice guidelines.

So now I guess, alongside beta readers, I need to get a beta cover looker atter.

Question dodged. But seriously, I'm worried now. How do I tell if something's marketable or not? I kind of took it for granted that I'd just know, but thinking about it I probably have a worse idea than most people having immersed myself in the conventions.

(As an aside, the Koontz one confused me. It’s the first DK one I’ve ever seen where his name wasn’t larger than the title.)

 

As somebody who reads a *lot*, I will make this possibly heretical observation:

Some of the best E books I have read had covers that could be charitably described as 'basic.'

This guy's cover is more complex, but he simply reused the same cover for each book in his series - though this looks like an updated version:
Amazon.com: FROM AWAY - Series One, Book One: A Serial Thriller of Arcane and Eldritch Horror eBook : Mackey Jr., Deke: Books

 

All-in-all, I'm not terribly impressed by most book covers from the big name authors. The Koontz novels I've seen are kinda boring as a rule. Most Stephen King book covers are also boring. But they do seem to do their job, heh.

There are oddball covers that I find myself liking. Now I'm wondering if this is a sort of Rorschach Test. One of the first that comes to mind is Storm Constantine's Wraeththu omnibus book cover (containing three novels): Wraeththu (Wraeththu #1-3) by Storm Constantine. (That photo doesn't really do it justice, not the real life thing, but oh well. You can enlarge it on Goodreads for a better look.)

 

Some of my all-time favorites, although I've only read each once.

 

I'm kinda assuming that word of mouth would still promote it, i.e. tie the author name to the book.

 

I think they should be paying dean koontz to have the use of his name to advertise for them.

 

Zepplin was not really made for radio either. They were mostly word of mouth and the best, so….

 

I take back my comment one-third:

Spotted in the Wild (Walmart 1-14-2022)
​

Saw these today. The first two are like most King book covers I've seen in the wild. Basic. Boring.

But the farthest to the right example is pretty cool and definitely makes me interested in knowing more about the story.

 

I do like the title's font. I'm wondering though if it's the name + that image that throws me off If It Bleeds. I instantly thought of Pet Sematary when I saw it, so it felt like a repeat, heh.