- Thread starter
- #21
Gryphos
Auror
Demesnedenoir said:The antag is pretty much a villian in this case, but one can always dance around definitions. So, the villian wins becuase he forces the hero to need what he wants, and the hero achieves what he needs to be done, both the same thing... but the villian is killed, which would be okay with said villian, because sacrifice of their life for the goal was an acceptable risk. Hero and villian both win, so to speak.
Depends what the protagonist wants. If their narrative goal is the thing that the villain also wants them to do, then they don't have a protagonist-antagonist relationship.