Mindfire
Istar
This thread is NOT about science or theology. Just to be clear.
Presently I'm trying to decide whether to set my big historical epochs in the context of centuries or millennia. If I go for an older earth, that leaves a lot of room for myths and legends and forgotten truths and ancient kingdoms. All that fictional history stuff that's fun to write about. But it also might mean there's a lot of "dead space" between the big historical/mythical events where nothing much happens. By contrast, if I set big events within centuries, there's not a lot of room for anything to become legendary or forgotten. You see what I mean?
Which is the better path? Go for the grander timescale and risk historical dry patches, or go for a more densely packed timeline and risk making the world feel small and losing that epic feel?
Presently I'm trying to decide whether to set my big historical epochs in the context of centuries or millennia. If I go for an older earth, that leaves a lot of room for myths and legends and forgotten truths and ancient kingdoms. All that fictional history stuff that's fun to write about. But it also might mean there's a lot of "dead space" between the big historical/mythical events where nothing much happens. By contrast, if I set big events within centuries, there's not a lot of room for anything to become legendary or forgotten. You see what I mean?
Which is the better path? Go for the grander timescale and risk historical dry patches, or go for a more densely packed timeline and risk making the world feel small and losing that epic feel?