A lot of people like that kind of fantasy. There are plenty of alternatives. There is no real reason that I can see to knock one or the other down. People should read what they like, and writers should write what they like.
I have a male elf tell the heroine in one of my stories how she's all brute force with no grace to drive home what a crude bruiser she is.![]()
Yeah, I've seen a lot of things that use traditional fantasy creatures and then just change the names. The Name of the Wind has 'draccus', which is a large lizard that I believe breathes fire. Trow are trolls. I think zombies are in there, too.
Sorry for the thread necromancy, but I want to raise the question of why elves, dwarves, and their ilk even persist in the fantasy genre up to today. Is it really because these races have widespread fanbases, as if most fantasy fans would rather not read anything else? I submit the alternative explanation that the reason Tolkien's races and tropes are so commonly adopted is precisely because our culture holds him in high esteem as the quintessential fantasy writer, the guy every other writer in the genre should strive to emulate. If you use Tolkien to define fantasy, of course people will single him out as a source for ideas. If there's any real demand to take elves et al out of fantasy, perhaps we should knock Tolkien off his pedestal.
By all means, don't write them if you don't like them. But don't try to take them away from me, because I love them. (Dwarves, trolls etc, I can take or leave. I think giants are probably due a makeover, and goblins are useful cannon fodder but not interesting to me in themselves.) But elves? You might as easily try to take the magic away from gods.
I think done properly ANY creature can be interesting. I think the most fun I had with a gaming campaign was playing a Kobold Shaman. Sure he was relatively weak on the melee side of things, but the ability to summon creatures and heal was very valuable to the party as a whole. Elves in the Tolkienesque depiction is a bit overdone in my opinion (aloof, magical, immortal etc.) and I would enjoy a fresher and more creative depiction myself. Another stereotype I find a bit overdone is the whole dwarves being miners/craftsmen a living in caves/underground.
I certainly agree that the stereotypical depiction of Goblins are best used for cannon fodder, but whose to say you can't soup them up a bit and make them interesting.
Elf 1 or Legolas would probably be most identified by fans of Tolkien or fantasy in general of what an elf is. Long blond hair, bow and arrow, graceful, etc. This is the version of elves that fantasy readers would most immediately point at if you said "Which picture do you most identify elves with."
Elf 2, or a Christmas elf, would probably be most non-fantasy fans' version of what an elf is. In fact, if you look up elf on a search engine, you'll find this elf is the most frequent.
Elf 3 or Drizzt (a dark elf) would probably only be able to be identified with people who have more than a surface knowledge of what an elf is. Some non-fantasy fans or people who haven't read about elves other than Tolkien's version of them may not even know dark elves exist in fiction.
So in actuality, the mainstream would probably most identify elves with Elf 2.
Elves are wonderful. They provoke wonder.
Elves are marvelous. They cause marvels.
Elves are fantastic. They create fantasies.
Elves are glamorous. They project glamour.
Elves are enchanting. They weave enchantment.
Elves are terrific. They beget terror.
The thing about words is that meanings can twist just like a snake, and if you want to find snakes, look behind words that have changed their meaning.
No one ever said elves are nice.
They're almost universally portrayed as "too beautiful, graceful, strong and magical".
Surely there are brutal, graceless elves as well?
See, I think this is the crux - it's not that elves and dwarves and orcs become too common, but rather that they ended up kinda stereotyped.
Ah yes, the old-school fair folk. I think Terry Pratchett summed it up best:
Truth be told, I'm not fond of this style of elf either. They tend to go one of two ways:
1): Totally incomprehensible. They might as well be a hurricane or an earthquake, so any reader interest must come from the protagonists instead.
2): Repeatedly described as alien, but written as essentially human--pretty and sociopathic, true, but displaying no personality traits that certain humans don't display, and demonstrating no reason why all the human characters look up to them. (Particularly irritating if elves killing humans is treated as normal and natural, but humans killing elves is treated as evil.)
Then again, maybe the "capricious, Tam Lin-grabbing" school of elves aren't supposed to be as alien as they look.
I've always thought that type of elf legend was taking on a particular purpose: like a lot of folk tales are ways to talk about fears of storms, disease, night animals, and so on, some elf stories were partly about a village's nobles. Glittering, nearly-invincible creatures that ride by and, on the slightest whim, develop either a grudge or a fascination with a peasant and then drag him into who-knows-what? Even the concept of spending a night in Elfdom that's a century in real-time sounds a lot like how a villager-turned-palace-servant might feel on coming home and realizing how differently her old friends looked at the world, and now at her.
Just one more thing in the elven mix.