Zero Angel
Auror
This came up in another forum. Here's my OP. Discuss:
Steerpike went on to say:
And then Ankari chimed in with:
And then Phil the Drill asked the logical question to prevent further derailment:
It should also be noted that my OP was in response to Mindfire saying how keeping people from knowing something that characters know was stupid...
Sums up everything so far? And go:
Jordan basically presents males and females as being absurdly proud of their sex and unwilling to accept that the opposite sex has any positive qualities whatsoever. This devolves to the point that the characters that LIKE and trust each other are unwilling to reveal what they know to each other and causes further issues for them.
I think it is a very backwards view of gender relationships, but maybe that is how it is for most people? Do all men assume that women know nothing and are ruled by their hormones and that a guy would know better in any situation? and do all women assume that men know nothing and are ruled by their anatomy and that a girl would know better in any situation?
Any male/female relationship in that book series almost always has internal dialogue where the POV character talks about how inept the opposite gender character is and how they can't confide in them because of their gender, when the thing that they should be confiding in them is the missing piece of the puzzle that the opposite gender character needed or if they would just bloody talk to each other without trying to take dominance they could see what they needed to do and how to beat the bloody bad guys.
In one to five chapters, the POV is reversed and we get treated to how the opposite gender character thinks all the characters that are opposite gender to them are inept and they can't tell them their missing piece of the puzzle.
It is B-E-Y-O-N-D frustrating for me while reading that series and the only thing I dislike about it.
Steerpike went on to say:
It's not a matter of humor or something like that. Jordan isn't writing a comedy. These are serious, world-changing issues and the characters in the book act quite seriously with respect toward them. Then you get people who have known each other all their lives withholding essential information from one another because of some gender consideration and the conspiracies that goes with them, and at some point it stretches credulity to the breaking point. It is one thing to poke fun at gender or even have ongoing tensions that revolve around gender, but when they characters get to the point that their actions are outright stupid and inexplicable (like not having a thirty second discussion with someone you've known your entire life in order to bring resolution to a problem), then it is so contrived as to be ridiculous. That's my problem with it.
And then Ankari chimed in with:
Yeah, it's the way power is distributed unevenly. Aes Sedai, Wisdom, Aiel wise ones and whatever the people that call the winds for the seafaring folk (Windcallers?). You don't have a lot of power falling in the hands of men, do you? It's unsettling to find all the power concentrated in one group with the other group having no chance of obtaining that power.
Until Rand came.
And then Phil the Drill asked the logical question to prevent further derailment:
Could we start a new thread to discuss Wheel of Time gender roles?
Pertaining to what people have said about these rules, I think "rules" are good to follow if they help your writing. Take a rule from one guy and take another from another one. If it helps your writing to have the rule "Always write upside down on Tuesday," then do that.
It should also be noted that my OP was in response to Mindfire saying how keeping people from knowing something that characters know was stupid...
Sums up everything so far? And go: