SnappingTurtle
Acolyte
I am working on a fantasy trilogy with elements of horror (see my introductory post in the Member Introductions sub-forum). In the past, I have always been able to set my stories on Earth, but I think this may be the first time where the story may involve the creation of my own world. I have been debating about whether to set this in a completely fictional world or to set this in an alternative Earth, similar to the setting of Atlas Shrugged, and I wanted to discuss this with others here.
I could think of arguments for the alternative Earth option. Parts of the plot involve animals that currently exist on Earth such as the duck-billed platypus. Several events throughout the trilogy involve piano music. The setting of the first book is a world similar to Earth in 2010 A. D. in terms of culture, political issues, and technological and scientific advancements; in fact, I could probably set the events of the first book to take place in Pittsburgh without substantially affecting the story. The setting of the third book is a futuristic dystopia that could also plausibly take place on Earth.
However, I could also think of equally convincing arguments for the fictional world. The second book, unlike the first and the third, would probably require a rewriting of history if I were to set the entire trilogy in an alternative Earth. The setting that I have envisioned is a steampunk-style civilization with culture and politics similar to those of ancient Greece whose destruction was brought on by a series of natural disasters; I have been unable to come up with an actual historical setting on Earth to match this vision. Also, all three books heavily involve a religion that has heavily influenced the thoughts, beliefs, and culture of this world. I wanted to avoid making this religion Christianity, but instead, incorporate elements from existing religions and exaggerate them.
My intuition says that if I could get away with setting this trilogy on Earth, then set it on Earth to ground this work in reality as much as fantasy fiction would allow; I would think it would be good to maximize the number of elements with which the reader could identify. But there are some aspects that would strongly indicate it would make more sense to set the entire trilogy in a completely fictional world.
What are others' thoughts? When do you set your work in a fictional world, and when do you set your work on Earth or some alternative version of it?
I could think of arguments for the alternative Earth option. Parts of the plot involve animals that currently exist on Earth such as the duck-billed platypus. Several events throughout the trilogy involve piano music. The setting of the first book is a world similar to Earth in 2010 A. D. in terms of culture, political issues, and technological and scientific advancements; in fact, I could probably set the events of the first book to take place in Pittsburgh without substantially affecting the story. The setting of the third book is a futuristic dystopia that could also plausibly take place on Earth.
However, I could also think of equally convincing arguments for the fictional world. The second book, unlike the first and the third, would probably require a rewriting of history if I were to set the entire trilogy in an alternative Earth. The setting that I have envisioned is a steampunk-style civilization with culture and politics similar to those of ancient Greece whose destruction was brought on by a series of natural disasters; I have been unable to come up with an actual historical setting on Earth to match this vision. Also, all three books heavily involve a religion that has heavily influenced the thoughts, beliefs, and culture of this world. I wanted to avoid making this religion Christianity, but instead, incorporate elements from existing religions and exaggerate them.
My intuition says that if I could get away with setting this trilogy on Earth, then set it on Earth to ground this work in reality as much as fantasy fiction would allow; I would think it would be good to maximize the number of elements with which the reader could identify. But there are some aspects that would strongly indicate it would make more sense to set the entire trilogy in a completely fictional world.
What are others' thoughts? When do you set your work in a fictional world, and when do you set your work on Earth or some alternative version of it?