BWFoster78
Myth Weaver
I'm entering Amazon's Breakthrough Novel Contest. 10,000 will compete; few will win. 80% of the entrants will be eliminated after only their 300-word pitch is read.
Perhaps I should spend some time working on my pitch.
I have some knowledge of how to write a good description, and I spent time yesterday reading through some pitches that made it through to the second round of last year's competition. Later today or tomorrow, I'll post my actual progress in the Showcase forum (please, please look for it; I need all the feedback I can get). For this thread, though, I'd like to discuss the overall strategy for what makes a pitch successful.
Here are my thoughts:
1. A good principle to keep in mind is that characters compel interest more than events. A pitch should focus on a character and how the story impacts him.
2. A character alone doesn't make a story. A pitch needs to introduce the significant situation.
3. The pitch is all about hooking the reader. You shouldn't give away the farm but, instead, introduce interesting questions that you promise to answer with your book.
I'm pretty sure about the first three. My thoughts are more nebulous about these next two:
4. Though you start with how the story personally impacts your character, your pitch needs to make clear that the significant situation has a much greater scope (I'm talking specifically about epic fantasy with this one. A literary novel may very well not have, or need, any greater scope.)
5. I think that a summation line at the end telling the reader the themes explored in the book might be a good idea. Something like: Power of the Mages is (genre) that explores the theme of...
My strategy right now is to cover all five of these points in the 300 words, devoting around 20% to each point, though I'd lump the first three together for a 60% total.
I really would love some feedback and discussion on this. I feel that my novel writing skills are reasonably strong (in that I can create a coherent story that doesn't completely suck), but I'm much less sure of my ability to draw interest using a 300 word summary.
Thanks!
Perhaps I should spend some time working on my pitch.
I have some knowledge of how to write a good description, and I spent time yesterday reading through some pitches that made it through to the second round of last year's competition. Later today or tomorrow, I'll post my actual progress in the Showcase forum (please, please look for it; I need all the feedback I can get). For this thread, though, I'd like to discuss the overall strategy for what makes a pitch successful.
Here are my thoughts:
1. A good principle to keep in mind is that characters compel interest more than events. A pitch should focus on a character and how the story impacts him.
2. A character alone doesn't make a story. A pitch needs to introduce the significant situation.
3. The pitch is all about hooking the reader. You shouldn't give away the farm but, instead, introduce interesting questions that you promise to answer with your book.
I'm pretty sure about the first three. My thoughts are more nebulous about these next two:
4. Though you start with how the story personally impacts your character, your pitch needs to make clear that the significant situation has a much greater scope (I'm talking specifically about epic fantasy with this one. A literary novel may very well not have, or need, any greater scope.)
5. I think that a summation line at the end telling the reader the themes explored in the book might be a good idea. Something like: Power of the Mages is (genre) that explores the theme of...
My strategy right now is to cover all five of these points in the 300 words, devoting around 20% to each point, though I'd lump the first three together for a 60% total.
I really would love some feedback and discussion on this. I feel that my novel writing skills are reasonably strong (in that I can create a coherent story that doesn't completely suck), but I'm much less sure of my ability to draw interest using a 300 word summary.
Thanks!