I'd say go into another. I would head into Salvatore's Drizz't series (yes, I know it is the D&D world, but let me have my own fantasies) and meet Drizz't and the gang. My world is interesting to me, but it isn't fully fleshed out yet. Don't want to disappear when I step on a blank space .
Would you rather your favorite author stick with the same characters through several novels or move on to a new set with each book?
Stick with the same characters through several novels. The novel format allows, more than any other, characters to grow and develop in a way that can make later developments immensely impactful. E.g., the Red Wedding, the epic stuff that happens later in the Harry Potter series, etc.
That said, I'd rather have the characters' story eventually come to an end, and not be revisited. Characters who have adventures for decades just get old eventually, with rare exception -- in fact, only one good exception I can think of: Miles Vorkosigan.
Next: What goes better with peanut butter: bananas or raisins?
That is a good one. Lord of the Rings for me. As far as the movies go, there is no question. With the books it is closer, but that is probably because I grew up with Harry, so those stories are special to me and my generation.
That's a really good one. I love both, and the King Arthur movie with Clive Owen was great, but I would go with Robin Hood. It's just a more interesting tale to me.
The one with a flying circus wins over the one who mixes slapstick with oddly childish jokes whose punchlines involve seeing a naked girl. (At age 13, my preference was the other way around.)
Sopranos, but only because my Mom lives in Kearny, NJ (pronounced carnie) and walks past "Satriale's" deli (seen in the opening credits and is really an abandoned building) on her way to church every Sunday.
Mr. Pibb. (Miss Pepper sounded so much sexier before she got her PhD.)
I don't know if I should ask... it's too political, and I'm afraid people might know where I stand. And God help the person who steps up and replies...