DragonOfTheAerie
Vala
Only if it isn't part of a world with alien geometry or is otherwise magical or supernatural.
If there's no explanation like that at all, though, we can't be left to assume it
Only if it isn't part of a world with alien geometry or is otherwise magical or supernatural.
If such an explanation is plausible in the context of the world, you can't assume it isn't part of the unseen worldbuilding backbone.
If such an explanation is plausible in the context of the world, you can't assume it isn't part of the unseen worldbuilding backbone.
the unseen worldbuilding backbone.
The way I see it, in a work of fantasy, if you as Author show me a river that runs uphill, my response is "well okay! they have rivers that run uphill". It's just part of the world that I as Reader am discovering as I go along.
Fair enough.That wouldn't fly with me, i'm afraid.
--Mysterious ruins from long ago connected to an 'elder race', of whom the current inhabitants of the world know nothing.
This is true, but as I see it, that's more our problem as Reader, not a problem with the Author or her work or abuse of tropes. If I as Reader refuse to lay aside my ultra-realistic preconceived notions when reading, for example, Harry Potter, then I'm rather missing the whole point. I might just as well read Tom Brown's School Days (randomly picked English boarding school novel).My comment isn't so much a continuation of the current debate but just a reaction to this phrase. Yes. Whenever I'm able to suspend disbelief about something in the fantasy world, there's usually the presumption that it's supported and fortified by some unseen worldbuilding backbone. In other words, I don't need every tiny detail explained in order to justify something in that world.
However we also run into preconceived "backbones" that we bring to the reading, so if something seems out of whack—well, it seems out of whack.
That would not likely be my reaction...but it might be, if the author had already won my trust that they got it covered. Still, if something is going to be that incongruous with what we bring into the story as a given, I would expect some explanation, or at least a reaction from the characters that it was weird.
Skyrim is in a series, it's not a standalone. It would be better to say Elder Scrolls.claiming it was an advanced race that suddenly disappeared (yes, Skyrim, I'm looking at you)